Because i have to...

FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!

So i finally got around to watching Deadliest Warrior's Shaka Zulu Vs. William Wallace.

I also happen to be of Scottish Decent. Take a wild guess who i was rooting for. William Wallace Won, SOLIDLY. Total, and utter pwnage. He was totally cool. Claymore is kickass, has been and always will be. And the line about "Know what we call that? A wee pointy Stick!" needs to be on a T-shirt.

So, i gotta wonder what Wallace's stats, as presented in the show at least, would be? I mean, by 4e standards he has to be minimum 8th level, If only because of feats. He'd defiantly be a barbarian, he was fast and he was powerful, but mostly powerful. He needed the multiclass feat for fighter for dual wielding targe and Dirk, He needed a Superior Weapon Feat to wield the Claymore, Superior Weapon Feat for the Ball and Chain, a feat to up his armor rating to heavy armor so he could wear chain mail, he had to have jack of all trades (During his education their was a focus on knowing variety), and linguist because he spoke multiple languages. Plus, he would have had the educated background upping his religion check.

Yeah, i'm so goonna play William Wallace in my next Campaign. Future DMs beware.

So yeah, just had to crow a bit.